On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:06:25 +0100, <[email protected]> wrote:
> > In this case/IMHO, font developer/maintener must use
> > ".ttf" (extension for OpenType:TTF, and TTF files).
> Just wondering, any practical problems using .otf extensions?
Nothing:)
Currently, we use FreeType2(or 1), that evade from this miss-named.
In rare situation, we *can* hit problem, such as pathname
accessing (e.g. find /usr/share -name '*ttf') .
So, this rename is aesthetics problem ;)
Regards,
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.