Re: Font packages

At Fri, 8 Jul 2011 02:08:18 +0000,
Bryan Baron wrote:
> 
> I recently submitted some font packages (ancient scripts) to M17N. I
> think I did a mistake naming them as foo-fonts.
> 
> What's the police for package names? Was that naming scheme right?

I vaguely remember that there were some guidelines in Wiki, but
in practice, we have no strict rule for it, so far.

Some packages are named as is, some are as *-fonts, and some fonts-*
or *-ttf-* or such.  Most likely named from the original source
tarball.

I find *-fonts name is OK, unless someone has a strong objection.

They are still only in M17N, not in FACTORY, so we are free to change
for now.


thanks,

Takashi
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]