Re: Re: [obs submit-request 124320] M17N/ibus-anthy: accepted by hillwood

At Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:23:23 +0800,
逍遥游 wrote:
> 
> I have not tested ibus-anthy in openSUSE 12.1, but I have tested it in
> openSUSE 12.2 beta 2 and it works OK. I think we can keep it for openSUSE
> 12.2. Please do not update it if using openSUSE 12.1 !

Well, the fact that it doesn't work for openSUSE 12.1 M17N repo
implies that something is really fishy in ibus-anthy code.

And it's clearly a beta version.  Any reason to rush to update to such
a version now (although ibus-anthy-1.2.7 works fine with ibus-1.4.1)?

I wouldn't mind testing a beta version for the test phase.  But for
the release phase, a beta version is no good sign unless you are 100%
sure that it works.  And I guess you cannot guarantee that.


Takashi

> 
> 2012/6/26 Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
> 
> > At Sun, 10 Jun 2012 01:40:21 +0900,
> > Fuminobu TAKEYAMA wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I updated ibus-anthy but it does not work at all on openSUSE 12.1 +
> > > ibus-1.4.1.
> > >
> > > I would like to ask:
> > > How did you test this package?
> > > Why did you update this package to unstable version?
> > >
> > >
> > > I cannot agree with updating IBus to 1.4.99 because some features have
> > > not been implemented and we might need patches to integrate into
> > openSUSE.
> >
> > Yes, this has hit me for long time, and I see no good way to fix
> > that.  Let's revert to version 1.2.7.
> >
> > I already prepared the package in my branch.  I'll do SR once after
> > checking the system builds.  (The local build was OK and I tested it
> > on real machines.)
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Takashi
> >
> [1.2  <text/html; ISO-8859-1 (quoted-printable)>]
> 
> [2 =?GB2312?B?MjAxMi0wNi0yNiAyMTowOToyOLXExsHEu73YzbwucG5n?= <image/png (base64)>]
>  
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]