Re: IBus 1.5

At Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:44:31 +0900,
Fuminobu TAKEYAMA wrote:
> 
> (2012/12/18 16:35), Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > Hm, does anyone already test coverage of all M17N packages with ibus
> > upgrade?  This is the first step as a migration, then we follow the
> > functional test of the upgraded project.
> 
> At least, hillwood and I have installed the ibus packages and
> been testing them to check whether they work as we expected.

That's good to hear.

What I meant as build test is to simply test the builds of all
(ibus-related) packages in a single project, e.g. M17N:Devel.
It's a simple systematic test, just to make sure that it doesn't break
any others.  This could be done in M17N as well, if M17N isn't
supposed to be a "stable" repo...

> > What's the actual breakage with M17N:Devel?  I see freetype2 update,
> > scim and fcitx updates.  If any package updates in M17N:Devel aren't
> > considered to be submitted to M17N at any time, such updates shouldn't
> > be included in M17N:Devel as well.
> 
> Sorry, I put freetype2 git snapshot there. It should be removed.

Thanks.  So, after removing it, we can just do "zypper dup" with
M17N:Devel for testing the new ibus, right?



Takashi
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]