Re: A plan to update ibus 1.5
hillwood <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.suse.m17n |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It's good. I have no objection . Fuminobu TAKEYAMA 写道: > Hi all, > > I've finished merging the three ibus packages. > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:ftake:branches:M17N/ibus > > Could you check changes that you intended are included in this package? > > > Now I agree to replace M17N's one with it because now I can guess > the GNOME team have a lot of tasks for ibus integration which we can > see on Fedora 19. > > We also need to consider initial configuration for DE other than GNOME. > No input method after first login. > > Do you have any comments? > > Fuminobu TAKEYAMA > > (2013/07/04 0:05), Fuminobu TAKEYAMA wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I tried. >> >> Fedora 19 introduced a new dialog shown at the first login >> so that it can set up ibus from the language selected by user. >> That was interesting. >> >> Unfortunately, on KDE, any input method framework didn't start. >> >> >> BTW, I asked Japanese users to update and test ibus to 1.5 placed at >> obs://home:ftake:ibus15/openSUSE_12.3 >> >> I received several reports on the problems of our package. >> I'll sumerize them later and share them here. >> >> >> I'm now merging three ibus from M17N, M17N:Devel, and dimstar. >> >> >> Fuminobu TAKEYAMA >> >> >> (2013/07/03 21:52), hillwood wrote: >>> 在 2013-06-26三的 00:13 +0900,Fuminobu TAKEYAMA写道: >>> Hi all: >>> Fedora 19 released on July 2, we can test ibus 1.5.2 in Fedora 19 in >>> order to decide whether update ibus to 1.5.2 in openSUSE. >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>>> We're leading. >>>> If so, we have to ask other distro guys to update and test it and >>>> fix its problems with us because we do not have enough human >>>> resource to do that. >>>> >>>> My concern is just that ibus 1.5 seems to be tested only on the latest >>>> GNOME and Fedora. >>>> >>>> I guess they will update ibus before 13.1 release even if we do not >>>> ask. >>>> >>>> But I heard from a Japanese Ubuntu developer that they may start to >>>> discuss >>>> whether they should switch IM from ibus to fcitx or not. >>>> >>>> >>>> BTW, anyone knows how to restart publisher of >>>> M17N:Devel/openSUSE_12.3/x86_64? >>>> It stops for several months by some reason. >>>> OBS says "No build possible atm, waiting for jobs in other >>>> repositories" >>>> >>>> Fuminobu TAKEYAMA >>>> >>>> (2013/06/23 23:39), Marguerite Su wrote: >>>>> Hi, listmates, >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Fuminobu TAKEYAMA >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Hello all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Let's restart to discuss toward 13.1. >>>>>> >>>>>> We had postponed to update ibus to 1.5.0 for 12.3 because of >>>>>> several regressions or >>>>>> bugs. >>>>>> # and other distributions such as Ubuntu also did. >>>>> >>>>> I have to clear the fact: >>>>> >>>>> Actually Ubuntu follows us. IBus maintainer for Ubuntu is a friend of >>>>> mine. He trusts our profession/specialty about Gnome, Input Methods, >>>>> Integration and improvement. >>>>> >>>>> So we don't need to take _other_ distributions into consideration. >>>>> We're leading. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In my opinion, the block was its functionality under GNOME, like: >>>>> >>>>> * Whitelist for functions. eg: some combo keys/buttons used by >>>>> Chinese/Japanese were blocked( IBus still had them). It was said such >>>>> regressions wouldn't be fixed before 3.9. >>>>> * Other weak implementations about input method GUIs in _core_. >>>>> >>>>> So we need to investigate if such situation turned better on GNOME >>>>> side. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Greetings >>>>> >>>>> Marguerite >>>>> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]