Re: Does our xim process need an update?
Marguerite Su <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.suse.m17n |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAK0PdA=TQBKmgvYn-p0h3Eecr8EeSjsK3MF9TDa6oS=pR9U8Og@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Takashi Iwai <[email protected]> wrote: > I thought GTK3_* and QT4_* are superfluous nowadays as Gtk3 and Qt4 > look at GTK_* and QT_* variables as well? > I borrowed that setting from Debian a long time ago, so I have no idea what's going on now. Since you and Wengxt both said so, I think they're superfluous now. > I guess a wrapper like > > #!/bin/sh > . /usr/lib/input-method/profile.d/auto/env > exec "$@" > > would work. But it's doubtful whether such a dynamic switch is really > demanded. Even with this mechanism, an application needs to be > restart in anyway. If a DE has some session management, it can > restart itself and restores the session after refreshing the > IM-related environment variables. You mean, just sourcing a script then everything will be all right? I'll test what you say...I'm not sure if DE session management will refresh itself when environment variable got changed Application restart is acceptable, I just don't want to relogin the DE... If so, can we leave some space for 3rd party to step in? because if input method framwork switch is doable, a YaST inputmethod won't be too far away :-) M -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]