Re: Does our xim process need an update?

Marguerite Su <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.suse.m17n
Message-ID <CAK0PdA=TQBKmgvYn-p0h3Eecr8EeSjsK3MF9TDa6oS=pR9U8Og@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Takashi Iwai <[email protected]> wrote:
> I thought GTK3_* and QT4_* are superfluous nowadays as Gtk3 and Qt4
> look at GTK_* and QT_* variables as well?
>

I borrowed that setting from Debian a long time ago, so I have no idea
what's going on now.
Since you and Wengxt both said so, I think they're superfluous now.

> I guess a wrapper like
>
> #!/bin/sh
> . /usr/lib/input-method/profile.d/auto/env
> exec "$@"
>
> would work.  But it's doubtful whether such a dynamic switch is really
> demanded.  Even with this mechanism, an application needs to be
> restart in anyway.  If a DE has some session management, it can
> restart itself and restores the session after refreshing the
> IM-related environment variables.

You mean, just sourcing a script then everything will be all right?

I'll test what you say...I'm not sure if DE session management will
refresh itself when environment variable got changed

Application restart is acceptable, I just don't want to relogin the DE...


If so, can we leave some space for 3rd party to step in? because if
input method framwork switch is doable, a YaST inputmethod won't be
too far away :-)

M
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.