Re: Does our xim process need an update?

Qiang Zhao <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.suse.m17n
Organization SUSE
Message-ID <[email protected]>
 > On this point, the default settings should be "auto select depending on
 > the current locale"
 > so far.

Sorry, I  think I didn't express my thought very clearly,  See the 
previous discussion:

Qiang:
 > 3, Select the default IM framework base language(current locale) is 
useless in my opinion,
 >      So I think select-im only accept an IM name parameter, and set 
for current user is enough.
 >      also, no need to divide in locale.d sub-folders. See my previous 
email.

Takashi
 > For IM "frameworks", it makes little sense to limit per locale,
 > indeed.  Most of IM frameworks are locale-agnostic.  Rather their
 > input method (engine) is specific to locale.  e.g. only ibus or fcitx
 > package is installed without the engine like ibus-mozc, it's almost
 > useless.
 >
 > A related question is whether we should mandate the IM framework for
 > all locales.  If user doesn't need more than XKB, why another layer
 > should be there to make things complicated?

Qiang:
 > On the other hand,
-  We still don't know which customer doesn't need more than XKB.
+ We still don't know which customer only need XKB.
 > So I think the better solution is to make an option on
 > chameleon-tongue/profile.d
 > of XKB(No IM Frame work but only XKB).
+ At the same time, abandon "auto select depending on  the current locale"
 > Please notice that even we choose by locales, it  will not always be 
right.

Takashi:
 > Right.  Currently "none" corresponds to XKB, as XKB is always there as
 > default on X.


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.