Re: should empty keybindings be allowed in scim?
Mike FABIAN <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.suse.m17n |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
James Su <[email protected]> : > Yes. And it's easy to fix. I can provide a patch against 1.2.0, so > that you can commit it into SL 9.3. Thank you, let's try that. > Regards > James Su > > Mike FABIAN wrote: > >>Tobias Burnus <[email protected]> : >> >> >> >>>>Maybe it should be allowed to disable keybindings by setting them to >>>>empty? Zhe Su, what do you think? >>>> >>>> >>>Hmm, better would be some methode to disable it which leaves the keys >>>untouched. >>> >>> >> >>For the trigger hotkey, maybe. >> >>But I think it might be useful if empty values for all configurable >>keybindings were allowed. Maybe one does not need a certain function >>at all and doesn't want to have it on any key in order not to hit it >>accidentally. Then it might be nice to make the key binding empty in >>the scim configuration dialog. >> >>Currently it is not possible to make such key bindings empty, if >>nothing is found in the configuration files, fallback key bindings >>which are hard coded in the source code are used. >> >>I think this would be easy to change to accept empty values to be able >>to disable certain key bindings, but would that make sense? >> >>Zhe, what do you think? >> >> >> > -- Mike FABIAN <[email protected]> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]