Re: wodim/cdrecord
Steven Sroka <[email protected]> Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:00:25 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.suse.multimedia |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 31 January 2011 02:07, jdd <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 31/01/2011 06:05, Dave Plater a écrit : > > >> A while ago sometime between 11.2 and 11.3, I think, Joerg Schilling the >> original cdrecord author came onto the factory list and bugged the hell >> out of everybody. As a result we have the correct one and imo it works a >> 100% better than the earlier one, > > Joerg is probably still here, he writes from time to time. And *yes*, > his cdrecord is much better than wodim. At least when it speaks about > writting Blu-Ray disks. I've heared that the original cdrecord is better than wodim as well. Plus, there are a lot of forums posts and bug reports regarding wodim ruining DVD's and so on listed throughout a Google search. I'd like to know, if possible, what are the difference between wodim and cdrecord? wodim, according to Joerg, is bastardized and some of us here can confirm that wodim causes problems, so what is the use it? If cdrecord is the original program and wodim seems not be reliable would it not be best to ship cdrecord and not wodim? > > It's available from factory but it looks to run without problem on 11.3. > > To allow k3b to use it it needs some tweeks, but easy to do (setting > the good cdrecord first in the k3b software configuration list) > > jdd > > > -- > http://www.dodin.net > http://pizzanetti.fr > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >