Re: Re: Booting openSUSE-NET-ppc-Build0003-Media.iso
"Richard (MQ)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.suse.ppc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 23/02/12 20:21, Larry Stotler wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Richard (MQ)<[email protected]> wrote: >> Booting NET ISO (build 0003) still (*) fails with "Insert CD number 1" but >> backing up to the configuration and specifying network install parameters >> (to local the server) loads the images and starts YaST. Yay! >> (*) This also occurred with OSL 11.0, previously run on this box. Same >> work-around. > > Yeah, evidently since there's no media it fails. There's probably a > way to set it up from the boot, but I don't remember how, and like you > said the work around does get you started. :-) >> Problem (1): SHA1 sum error: ftp://.../oss/boot/ppc/config Continue (Y/N). I said Y... Is >> this just me (maybe a corrupted image, but rsync is good at not doing that and was >> used for both transfers) or is it a bug? > > More than likely it is the test of the package that is failing. I had > an issue with that with the older 10.x systems with a lot of MD5 > errors on the packages from the CDs. It could be that there is a > problem with the RAM, which is what I think was wrong with mine. > However, I could usually skip enough to get a bootable system and fix > it then. Try doing a minimal install just to get a working system and > then add in what you need/want. That will also help narrow down where > we have broken packages. I think the RAM & other hardware is OK - OS-X boots as expected. I just realised that I can check the file SHA1 sum on the server - I'll do that in the morning. Not sure how many people are on this list, I assume no-one else sees the error but is that because no-one is testing? Or is the sum wrong on the repo? >> Problem (2): YaST then reports no hard disc, and getting a console with >> Alt-F2 and running "fdisk -l" confirms this. I assume the necessary module >> is not being loaded, but how do I find which one? I may be able to run OSL >> 11.0 again to see what it loads, if I can find the Hard Disc - or at least a >> gzipped image to create one. Sounds like a bug unless caused by (1) - I >> wonder if it's worth creating one in bugzilla? > > Are you sure there's a disk in it? You should use pdisk to partition, > not fdisk. fdisk should still see the drive but it will be empty. My bad. But there is an HD - it boots OS-X just fine. So "fdisk -l" should at least report it, as should pdisk. Will try the latter tomorrow. Looks to me like a missing module - I need that OSL 11.0 HD > IIRC some machines still show the drives as IDE with the /dev/hdx I'll check this, but "pdisk -l" alone (no device specifier) should list all devices (subject to driver modules), no? >> Hardware is a G3 "New world" iMac from 1999 (the iconic translucent blue >> model) ("G5" in my earlier message was a typo). 512M RAM, 333 MHz PPC CPU. I >> also have somewhere a MacBook from the same era, will try that too when I >> have time. > > It would be a PowerBook from that era. MacBooks are Intel based. > Just make sure it's not an Old World Mac. Those won't boot from CD > like the newer Colored Macs. Again, my bad. I think it's a Powerbook ("Lombard" G3, with a dodgy keyboard IIRC). > I don't have a fast enough internet connection to do an install so I > haven't had time to test it yet. rsync is your friend! repo is around 10G at the moment. > > I DID grab the Fedora 16 PPC install DVD and hop to try it out next > week when I have time. Is that easy to find on their site? I'd appreciate a link if not. -- Cheers Richard (MQ) Linux user # 439271 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]