Re: Update Sugar packages

2012/8/21 Lars Vogdt <[email protected]>:
> On Di 21 Aug 2012 08:34:16 CEST Xin Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, this was not necessary until now. I'm just aware of a handful
>>> packages
>>> (from > 400) that were reported via Bugzilla and needed a fix for an old
>>> release. Patching them and re-enabling build in the Education project
>>> itself
>>> was much easier than providing a branch of the whole Education project.
>>> Further development was also not affected as those packages were broken
>>> on
>>> younger releases, too.
>>>
>>
>> I see.
>>
>> If I got it right, active development period of Education release
>> begins near new openSUSE release, so there will be little conflict
>> between maintenance time of old one and development time of the new.
>
>
> Yes, right.
>
>
>
>> When a new version is released, old one will be obsoleted soon.
>>
>> is that right?
>
>
> The old packages simply stay in the old repositories (for the old
> distributions) if someone just disables them in the OBS. For the enduser of
> this distribution it simply looks like there are no more package updates.
>
> The old version will just be obsoleted if a) there's a bug report against
> that old package or b) the packager himself decides to release an update for
> the old distribution.
>

OK, I get it.

> With kind regards,
> Lars
>
>
>



-- 
Xin Wang (http://dram.me/)
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]