Re: Suggestion to the new wiki page design for individual packages

James Tremblay aka SLEducator <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.suse.schools.usa
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Lars Vogdt wrote:
> Hi Kirill
>
> On Mo 22 Dez 2008 23:44:40 CET Kirill Kirillov
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 1) Old wiki page design for individual packages:
>> http://en.opensuse.org/Geogebra
>>
>> 2) Suggestion to the new wiki page design for individual packages:
>> http://en.opensuse.org/MultiplicationStation
>>
>> What do you like more?
>
> I'm fine with both.
>
> 2 is more "wiki-like",
>
> 1 is more like a newspaper story - if the "Info-Box" on the right side
> is "leaft-floated" with the normal description.
>
> But looking at the "source code" (the wiki markup), I like 1 more,
> because it's simpler.
>
> So: +1 for suggestion 2.
>
>
>> Any comments will be very appreciated.
>
> I miss links to the Categories, so people can easily find similar
> software by clicking on (for example) "Math" or "Up from 6 years".
>
> Perhaps it's also possible to add a link like
> "http://software.opensuse.org/search?p=1&q=Geogebra" (replace Geogebra
> with the package name) to the repository? This makes it easier for
> people to find and directly install the software. But I'm not shure if
> this makes it more complicated in the source text.
>
> Download Size/Installed Size -> really necessary?
>
> Perhaps an extra chapter "See also" listing similar packages is helpful?
>
>
>> I've taken Fedora design as the base:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Games/neverball
>
> Thanks!
> Lars
>
Hello Kirill,
I would agree with Lars, esthetically I liked both, with some leanings
toward 2.
JT
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.