Re: rpm database integrity
"Carlos E. R." <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.suse.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2014-09-16 23:06, pinguin74 wrote: > Hello, > > at sans.org I read: > > "The first thing to do is check the contents of /var/lib/rpm. The > databases should have a date/time stamp of when you originally installed > the system. If you see a different date, be suspect of the integrity of > the databases." Absurd. > Well, on my system the time stamp of the files within /var/lib/rpm do > not carry the time stamp from original installation, the time stamp seem > to be the last time I installed some new stuff with YaST. Correct. > But, the time stamp of the directory /var/lib/rpm itself actually is the > original time from installation. Nope. Mine says "Dec 19 2013", which is not the installation date, which I know was about Dec 2002. It could the the last system upgrade, but that was on 2014-02-25. So no, that directory timestamp is not the system installation date. Maybe on some circumstances it is. > I now wonder, does sans.org tell us something not entirely correct? I don't know what they say about other things, but in this particular thing, and at least on openSUSE, they are absolutely wrong. > When you install stuff, doesn´t the time stamps change below /var/lib/rpm ? They do. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar)
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlQYrmgACgkQtTMYHG2NR9UahQCfai26taxnPlnVHK+j8CQk/1u1 fSQAnjyHTOht69A1n6PVKQA5U67zNNRz =Iq9Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----