Re: yup repositories for SLE 12?
Marcus Meissner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.suse.security |
|---|---|
| Organization | SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendoerffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg) |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:18:05PM +0100, Frank Steiner wrote: > Marcus Meissner wrote > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 01:14:26PM +0100, Frank Steiner wrote: > >> Frank Steiner wrote > >> > >>> Could that be because the credentials from /etc/credentials.d/NCCcredentials > >>> are not valid for SCC? I don't have SCCcredentials, likely I had to run > >>> suseRegister again on a SLE 12 system to get them.... > >> Yes, that worked. I quickly setup a SLES 12 in a VirtualBox and got > >> the SCCcredentials. Using them I can now access and download the > >> SLES 12 updates even from a SLE 11 SP3 server. To download > >> SDK and SLED, too, they must be added as add-on products once. > >> Their credentials are the same as the SLES ones, so yup will indeed > >> work with only one user/pass string, but the different products must be > >> "connected" with these credentials by registering them once. > > Just for the records: I failed to access SLED updates because I could not > add SLED as add-on product to SLES (not that it would make much sense, > just for registering them together with one set of credentials... But I > could not find a URL to add for SLED updates that would ask me for the > registration code...). So I installed SLED on its own and got different > credentials. I could add SDK to this set, too. > > I will just add some code from the old yup to read the values from config > files and everything is fine :-) Workstation Extension contains some desktop packages at least... if you are interested in them. > > I have not yet reverse engineered SMT (which you could still just use btw). > > I tried to find the mentioned smt 2.0.7 for SLE 11, but searching > on updates.suse.com I get only an iso images for a 1.x version from 2013, > so I couldn't check the migration ability. When SLE 12 is running, I > will definitely take a look at it. However, yup perfectly allows for > adjusting to our own needs: always keep only the newest rpm versions, > not fetching patch.rpm etc. is really easy to adjust with changing some > lines of code :-) > > Thanks again for all your help! :) Ciao, Marcus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]