Re: seccheck: prune directories possible?
"Carlos E. R." <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.suse.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2014-12-03 08:33, Werner Flamme wrote: > Carlos E. R. [01.12.2014 16:06]: > Depends. When I use the (newer) version from security repo, I'm in > for a change every few days sometimes. I see. Yes, that changes things. Then you do need to report in Bugzilla. At this moment it doesn't occur to me a change that could be generalized. However, is the script really changed that often? Make diffs and find out, perhaps it is not changed. > I try to think about something that will make manual interaction > unneeded, until the changes are very incompatible... The alternative is accepting huge emails. You will have to report in bugzilla, and wait. Meanwhile, you have to edit the file manually, or write a sed script in cron or somewhere that changes back the line in the weekly security script. > If / means everything, why would the script bother to find out > about mountpoints at all? True. That's what I don't understand. > As you found out, $MNT is used by the "find" command with the > option "-mount", which is explained on my manpage as "Don't descend > directories on other filesystems.". That's why there is a need to > discover mountpoints at all. Ah, I understand now. It is mountpoints, not directories. - -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlR/DOwACgkQtTMYHG2NR9UbCQCfQZoB93rVvY1EyvdsfNp+1LH6 xxIAoI5h1CvQn5t68mlpfApBC/YSb3ck =HxkR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]