Re: Re: [security-announce] openSUSE Leap 42.1 has reached end of SUSE support
Richard Brown <[email protected]> Thu, 18 May 2017 16:09:54 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.suse.opensuse.project,gmane.linux.suse.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAA0b23y8xPeH2C1rxvEu4F49yPW-OY7Ok4Z6CHit2YAuFfbpiA@mail.gmail.com> |
On 18 May 2017 at 07:33, Michal Kubecek <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday, 17 May 2017 15:18 Mathias Homann wrote: >> ...have we at any time in the past ever had a situation where there >> was only ONE version of openSUSE officially supported? >> >> I mean, Leap 42.3 is not out yet... > > Current situation is quite different from what we had earlier. In the > old model, each new version was really new, forked fresh from Factory, > so that there was in actually no real "major" and "minor" version. As > new versions came each 6 or 8 months (more or less), noone could blame > users who did not want to do a full upgrade to new codebase so often. > That's why there was an overlap between [n] and [n+2], so that you could > skip e.g. 12.2 and upgrade directly from 12.1 to 12.3 without losing > support at any moment. > > With Leap 42.x, core packages (mostly) follow SLE ones where the policy > is that upgrading in a new service pack should be well reasoned, not > just "hey, there is a new upstream version". And this logic should apply > to most of the distribution - or at least that is the plan. There are > exceptions, of course, as some packages do not fit into this model well > and some maintainers do not agree with this policy, but in general, Leap > 42.x and 42.(x+1) should be much closer to each other than e.g. 12.1 and > 12.2. Therefore users should fear upgrading to next point release less > and it should make much less sense to skip 42.2 and upgrade 42.1 systems > directly to 42.3. > > What is a different story, though, is moving to new major version with > completely new codebase. IMHO we should think very carefully about the > overlap of lifetimes of last 42.x and 43.0/15.0/whatever it is called. > IMHO it would make good sense to have longer overlap (12 months?) > between those. Release Dates of SLE/Leap 15 are not yet final, so this is an educated estimate based on the information I have available to me, but we're currently looking at a situation where there should be a minimum of 9 months between the release of Leap 15 and the end of life of 42.3. There is a possibility that the overlap could be extended beyond that. We'll see. I'm involved in conversations on the topic but I wouldn't expect any news in this area quickly, as there are lots of moving parts involved. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe-stAJ6ESoqRxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org To contact the owner, email: [email protected]