Re: Build Service key
[email protected] Wed, 4 Oct 2017 18:17:51 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.suse.security |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--aziWXe2aaRGlkyg3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Malte, On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:33:45AM +0200, Malte Gell wrote: > Why does the security team have two keys? We use only 0x317CD502, 0x3D25D3D9 is revoked. > Is 0x317CD502 the successor to 0x3D25D3D9? Yes > Why did 0x3D25D3D9 need a successor? We wanted to increase the key size. Johannes --=20 GPG Key E7C81FA0 EE16 6BCE AD56 E034 BFB3 3ADD 7BF7 29D5 E7C8 1FA0 Subkey fingerprint: 250F 43F5 F7CE 6F1E 9C59 4F95 BC27 DD9D 2CC4 FD66 SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imend=F6rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG N=FCrnberg) --aziWXe2aaRGlkyg3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJZ1QmtAAoJELwn3Z0sxP1mTI0P/25z9QTLj+3WT50KwEHeorRS LODbMjnod80fJl5zyMuMTe7GKA1A1VeZVzv04IPZ1ys/9ND75Yx1xjtHRTC/ue/J SaLkipIM0WZL9CXf/bSKbhApmtLiUsBJfDkI6VN4VC2727XTh7iT51YK4JdRJveD s1TRQaHS6IGxe97gWnC7HzaPBZe+MeOVivSILhky8dmSo8JjG/xsOGXK8G4ZcrAL 1/PHmKZ6FvlMVl7bxAqzVBjsya1xrZBqSmMXDEBf19MnEWZdc8upNWkDYwXtw/p6 +x4XS3tQJoLuxCLKu8PrxCsOKHauIUGsWUZ+suTPAqvsQzwkgPkWVhhAvSr/ERx5 DCJjf0cHeRJOO/JfqDM4Rh2j7awVssyQcQ6jG/q+VG3LQzvFHvpBjUjA5FjOfY9O ZRddIKBAL+PpZ9Tx9zOOSvbiwtOSr5tUc1Wk6UMIK+VEYS5F8SmMTjop9vRzEsL+ kyyerJ0Xv+1M7WozPSuh5b8mR9sdXGWgMA0E/ueTKJS20HJnj3xpxdCwpqfeKXz2 Kbw0+eDq0eutOlKFJL+YFCZrOu+oRbjwqK5tfMRsMG64yeDua2my452NVbyiDlbU WhsNRmVFaKX618vXeYsV+bQ0vvyPcjsKp18OD8LD8ImRoPUG7//2HI55h6aTxfdA 1vNZiwUNG7C+1UJu7i4X =v6DO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aziWXe2aaRGlkyg3-- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]