Re: The end of TuxOnIce.
Andrea Gelmini <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.swsusp.devel,gmane.linux.swsusp.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAK-xaQaK==_e7dwOQNs7vTn-xvkCqVL0bPh1sMrfdi8_E6HDkg@mail.gmail.com> |
2011/11/1 Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>: > I'm therefore writing to let you all know that I'm planning on calling > it a day. Before I do that, however, I'd like to get the input of > others. Does my evaluation of things sound fair to you? Can anyone make > an argument for not stopping development of TuxOnIce? Well, TOI works (even where vanilla kernel fails). Toi works well (a lot better than vanilla one). TOI is faster and safer (than vanilla). But the most important feature is your way to develop it. You are kind and smart. You listen the problem, you fix 'em. That's really great. No tons of useless aggressive emails without code (as others do). You just do it. It's a shame TOI isn't in mainstream kernel. The choice is, of course, yours. I just can say thanks. Really. Ciao, Andrea