Re: The end of TuxOnIce.

Andrea Gelmini <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.swsusp.devel,gmane.linux.swsusp.general
Message-ID <CAK-xaQaK==_e7dwOQNs7vTn-xvkCqVL0bPh1sMrfdi8_E6HDkg@mail.gmail.com>
2011/11/1 Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>:
> I'm therefore writing to let you all know that I'm planning on calling
> it a day. Before I do that, however, I'd like to get the input of
> others. Does my evaluation of things sound fair to you? Can anyone make
> an argument for not stopping development of TuxOnIce?

Well, TOI works (even where vanilla kernel fails). Toi works well (a
lot better than vanilla one). TOI is faster and safer (than vanilla).
But the most important feature is your way to develop it. You are kind
and smart. You listen the problem, you fix 'em. That's really great.
No tons of useless aggressive emails without code (as others do). You
just do it.
It's a shame TOI isn't in mainstream kernel.

The choice is, of course, yours.
I just can say thanks. Really.

Ciao,
Andrea
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.