Re: Proposed git tree changes.
Lamarque Vieira Souza <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.swsusp.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, Me too wanted this one, many thanks Nigel. By the way, is there any working tuxonice patch for kernel 3.2? I tried to apply TOI 3.1 but there are many failed hunks. Another question. I have noticed that the kernel's block cache is being almost completely dropped during my suspend/resume cycles. /sys/power/tuxonice/no_pageset2 is 0, so TOI should save as much as possible of the block cache memory. In my last resume cycle the image size after compression is 603830169 bytes, with 976561 pages available for storage (my swap file is 4 GB). The image does not occupy not even 1/4 of the available storage. Is there any other nob in TOI that could prevent it from saving the block cache? Em Thursday 26 January 2012, Milan Oravec escreveu: > Hi Nigel, for me +1. > > Milan > > On 01/26/2012 03:56 AM, Kenneth R. Crudup wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Jan 2012, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > >> - Make one big git tree instead of separate ones for each branch > > > > I've wanted this for a long time. > > > > -Kenny > > _______________________________________________ > TuxOnIce-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.tuxonice.net/listinfo/tuxonice-devel -- Lamarque V. Souza http://www.geographicguide.com/brazil.htm Linux User #57137 - http://counter.li.org/ http://planetkde.org/pt-br _______________________________________________ TuxOnIce-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.tuxonice.net/listinfo/tuxonice-devel