Re: Fixed at last!

Milan Oravec <[email protected]> Tue, 05 Jun 2012 09:30:11 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.swsusp.devel
Organization CIKT UKF Nitra
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Harald, I'll look for those steps, but I don't have any experience 
with code bisecting.

I thing problematic commit was introduced later (not  3.2-rc6 and 
3.2-rc8), somewhere in 3.3 development phase, because all 3.2.xx kernel 
are working fine.

- TuxOnIce core  : 3.2.1
- Kernel Version : 3.2.10-05355-gf5dcb59
- Compiler vers. : 4.4
- Attempt number : 63
- Parameters     : 0 667648 0 0 -2 5
- Overall expected compression percentage: 0.
- Compressor is 'lzo'.
   Compressed 2506092544 bytes into 775863186 (69 percent compression).
- Block I/O active.
   Used 192288 pages from swap on /dev/sda3.
- Max outstanding reads 3284. Max writes 1797.
   Memory_needed: 1024 x (4096 + 368 + 112) = 4685824 bytes.
   Free mem throttle point reached 0.
- Swap Allocator enabled.
   Swap available for image: 776990 pages.
- I/O speed: Write 211 MB/s, Read 302 MB/s.
- Extra pages    : 42 used/2000.
- Result         : Succeeded.

09:23:11 up 83 days, 20:12, 15 users,  load average: 2.35, 0.82, 0.39

Best regards,

Milan


S pozdravom

Milan Oravec

CIKT UKF Nitra
Mobil: +421907670270
email: [email protected]

On 06/04/2012 07:05 PM, Harald Judt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 04.06.2012 18:53, schrieb Milan Oravec:
>> Hi, problems with TOI reliability under memory pressure are note solved
>> yet. :( Tested latest git.
>>
>> Milan
>
> I wanted to bisect that, but have not found enough spare time yet. This
> is quite time consuming. The guilty commit must be somewhere between
> 3.2-rc6 and most probably 3.2-rc8, maybe you could help and do some
> bisecting yourself? I've posted steps to reproduce this easily on this
> mailing list some days ago.
>
> Harald
>