Re: [TuxOnIce-users] Anyone object to removing LZF?
Oon-Ee Ng <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:08:29 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.swsusp.devel,gmane.linux.swsusp.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGQ70etj59hxCBO6dDypd_g9dRWhyVotDgZZ3gOKWpT_5EOApw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all. > > For a long time now, LZF has been being distributed with the TuxOnIce patch > as a new Cryptoapi plugin. Now that it's been a few months since we found > the issue that was wrongly making us think it was more reliable than LZO, > I'm thinking about removing the LZF code from the patch. > > Does anyone object, and if so, why? > > Regards, > > Nigel Without knowing any of the details, wasn't LZF mentioned as faster somewhere, for use in hibernating, compared to LZO? That's the only user-facing-issue I can think of, otherwise no big deal.