Re: xrexec* and S01-localapps

Oliver Grawert wrote:
> why did nobody agree when i brought that up at the hackfest ? 
> indeed they belong in their own package :)
> is someone keen top open a new branch for them ? else i will do that on
> the weekend (currenty its only the two scripts that are functional, so i
> would propose these to be in the actual loaclapps-trunk, the broken C
> code should be in an experimental branch imho). 
> 

Well, now I know exactly why the C code is broken.  I'm going to use the 
shell version as a template to fix the C version.

The shell version is especially slow and CPU hungry.  The C version 
would be less so, but I am not entirely happy with it because it uses 
polling to check for changes in the atom string.

Warren

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-developer mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-developer
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net