Re: fedora: where are the client's logs kept?
jam <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.terminal-server.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 18 August 2008 03:01:25 ltsp-developer-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uuRhgaa4a2kL@public.gmane.orgnet
wrote:
> > I'm curious, while I am thankful that you're fixing up the x86_64 client
> > support, how is x86_64 thin clients a benefit to you over i386?
> >
>
> The guy I'm helping went out and bought a bunch of sub-$500 x86_64
> boxes. He'd
> like to get use out of the hardware.
>
> Plus I'm expecting great performance with ltsp-localapps.
I'm still following Warrens thought chain ...
Why do you believe a 64 bit system is better-performing than 32 on same
hardware?
My tests show about the same, some slightly worse, some slightly better.
64 bit IS better with RAM > 1G, depending on what you do maybe much better.
A bunch of Sub-$500 will work beautifully on 32 bit. No reason to not play
with 64bit clients, but for real-work I see no benefit and some disadvantages
eg the whole flash ndpluginwrapper saga.
So to reask :-) Warrens question: how is x86_64 thin clients a benefit to you
over i386?
> Plus I'm expecting great performance with ltsp-localapps.
You are going to be disappointed :-)
Thanks
James
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-developer mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-developer
For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net