Re: fedora: where are the client's logs kept?
John Ellson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.terminal-server.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
jyoung-z3OK0Yh6KsD9d7wJ/[email protected] wrote: > Maybe the question could be re-phrased... > > "Are you having any trouble running 32-bit images on your x86_64 thin > clients?" > Not so far, and I'm not having any trouble with 64bit images either. Now I have options with our sub $500 64bit, 2G RAM, client systems. I have both client images on the same server. It takes perhaps 2min, including client rebooting, to switch a client back to 32 bit if needed. Its a mountain. It needs climbing. OK? > James and Warren seem to be implying that you shouldn't have any trouble. > > > Jeremy D. Young > Sr. Programmer/Analyst > O'Reilly Auto Parts > > ltsp-developer-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org wrote on 08/18/2008 05:00:23: > > >> On Monday 18 August 2008 03:01:25 ltsp-developer-request@lists. >> sourceforge.net >> wrote: >> >>>> I'm curious, while I am thankful that you're fixing up the x86_64 >>>> > client > >>>> support, how is x86_64 thin clients a benefit to you over i386? >>>> >>>> >>> The guy I'm helping went out and bought a bunch of sub-$500 x86_64 >>> boxes. He'd >>> like to get use out of the hardware. >>> >>> Plus I'm expecting great performance with ltsp-localapps. >>> >> I'm still following Warrens thought chain ... >> >> Why do you believe a 64 bit system is better-performing than 32 on same >> hardware? >> >> My tests show about the same, some slightly worse, some slightly better. >> 64 bit IS better with RAM > 1G, depending on what you do maybe much >> > better. > >> A bunch of Sub-$500 will work beautifully on 32 bit. No reason to not >> > play > >> with 64bit clients, but for real-work I see no benefit and some >> > disadvantages > >> eg the whole flash ndpluginwrapper saga. >> >> So to reask :-) Warrens question: how is x86_64 thin clients a >> benefit to you >> over i386? >> >> >>> Plus I'm expecting great performance with ltsp-localapps. >>> >> You are going to be disappointed :-) >> >> Thanks >> James >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _____________________________________________________________________ > Ltsp-developer mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-developer > For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net > > -- John Ellson ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-developer mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-developer For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net