Re: ltsp-server vs. syslinux (pxelinux.0)
Warren Togami <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.terminal-server.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Josh Dukes wrote: > Why not copy pxelinux.0 from /usr/lib/syslinux while setting up > the /var/lib/tftpboot/ltsp/* dirs? And speaking of that, why isn't the > dir structure under /var/lib/tftpboot with only ltsp kernel/img/inird > under the ltsp/<arch> dirs? > Tftp gets used for lots of things. We even use pxe for other things. > Why should the ltsp packages focus so much on being stand-alone? > I have the same issue with the debian/ubuntu version. It seems to me > that packaging the same data multiple times is just bad practice, no > matter how insignificant the data is. > I guess I just don't understand. Maybe it's because I missed the > discussion that lead to the current dir structure... > Debian/Ubuntu have the same structure because we build from exactly the same ltsp upstream. I suppose it could be copied from the system dir as part of ltsp-update-kernels, but seriously is this a high priority problem? One possible issue with copying it from a common system dir is that that common system dir might be different on different distros. Warren Togami [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-developer mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-developer For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net