Re: [PATCH] xrexecd-localapp-plugins32.diff

Warren Togami wrote:
> CyberOrg wrote:
>> Hello Community
>>
>> The attached patch uses browser plugin that are installed on the
>> server if it is 32bit.
>>
> 
> Oh, I also question whether it is a good idea at all to use this kind of 
> hack even if it were fixed.
> 
> My vote would be no, we don't want this particular hack in upstream. 
> But let us see what vagrantc, ogra, and dberkolz say.

If the others upstream agree that this is a bad idea to go into 
upstream, perhaps this is OK as a separate ldm rc.d script that could be 
installed from an optional add-on package.

Opinions?

Warren Togami
[email protected]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-developer mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-developer
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net