Re: [Fwd: Using nxagent for roundtrip suppression]
Veli-Matti Lintu <veli-matti.lintu-Wdv/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.terminal-server.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Opinsys Oy |
| Message-ID | <1220514094.11113.222.camel@localhost> |
I also had some tests done on the performance improvements, but it seems like sourceforge rejects those no matter what I do. I'll post those if someone can figure out how to bypass the sourceforge filters.. Veli-Matti Lintu to, 2008-09-04 kello 10:37 +0300, Veli-Matti Lintu kirjoitti: > Hello, > > Sourceforge has been rejecting the mail complaining this: > > <[email protected]>: host > mail.sourceforge.net[66.35.250.206] said: 550 This message matches a > blacklisted regular expression (pharma ban) (in reply to end of DATA > command) > > It doesn't seem to matter what I take out of the mail, so I'm just going > to split it in several smaller messages. I have absolutely no idea why > sourceforge thinks that nxagent isn't an allowed topic.. > > > > I've been doing experiments on how to improve the performance of LTSP5 > thin clients. After many unsuccessful attempts, FreeNX's nxagent > component shows some great promise to improve LTSP graphics performance > especially on lower end thin clients. Using nxagent only for roundtrip > suppression means that there's no need to do any changes on the ltsp > root image and all changes are server based. This approach is quite > different from the scripts using nxclient with LTSP as this uses > ldm/gdm/whatever to login and no nxclient is needed. Also localdevs, > audio etc. work without changes. > > nxagent is a virtual X server that runs on the LTSP server and the X > applications connect to it instead of the thin client's X server. > nxagent replies to the X requests locally and also reduces the number of > requests sent to the real X server. I haven't dug into all the details > on what nxagent does, but it seems to reduce the number of packets sent > to the thin client by 60-70% in some cases. > > The setup is experimental, but seems to work. There are some problems > with failed session starts when logging in and problems with hanging > processes when logging out. Also the performance impact on the server is > still unknown. Feel free to test it though. > > Has anyone done similar experiments? Or do you know of any caveats using > nxagent this way? > > Veli-Matti Lintu > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-developer mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-developer For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-developer mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-developer For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net