Re: low RAM usage (plans: XDMCP/LDM/...

Jim McQuillan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.terminal-server.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>

jam wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 11:11 -0700,
> ltsp-developer-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org wrote:
>> hi,
>> Am Freitag, den 21.03.2008, 11:42 +0200 schrieb Michael Shigorin:
>>> Well I told ogra quite a while ago on IRC that I consider ruining
>>> what worked in favour of some specific Ubuntu development goals
>>> is a Bad Thing(TM)... 
>> that has nothing to do with any ubuntu goals ... the definition for
>> ltsp5 was made up at the detroit hackfest two years ago where debian,
>> ubuntu/edubuntu, fedora/k12ltsp and upstream were involved (nad
>> Novell/SuSE was invited but didnt find it worth to send someone)
> [snip]
> 
> Jim your views are laudable but ummmm not useful ...
> 
> LTSP5 should be the shining best way to impliment TCs and not be
> crippled by lofty goals of trying to use pentium and 16M etc.
> 
> It supports all the latest hardware, does fancy local media, sound etc
> etc. WOW
> 
> LTSP4 should be used for old hardware, small RAM, and the resulting loss
> of functionality.
> 
> The fact that LTSP4 is no longer supported means your developers ARE NOT
> INTERESTED IN THE KRAPPY HARDWARE side of town with a 2.4 kernel etc
> etc.
> 
> LTSP4 does exist and can deal with old HW. Lets not spoil EVERYTHING by
> being greedy trying to fit LTSP5 into a box where it does not fit.
> 
> Telling one of [our] your developers that his work is krappy because it
> won't work with limited resources is really stupid. We choose MooKow
> because of the benefits, but there are costs too. c'est'la vie

Did I say his work is krappy?  Look back at the thread.

I support Oliver and the work he's done.  I only mentioned that there's 
room within the project to also support smaller hardware (both old and 
new).

I didn't say it's required that we MUST support it, but if people want 
to put their efforts into providing code that works, then that's 
something that we should at least consider.

If your needs are satisfied using new hardware, great, your needs are 
already being met.

Jim.


> James
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Ltsp-developer mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
>       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-developer
> For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-developer mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-developer
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.