Re: LocalApps possible help, delai or solution?
Ondrej Valousek <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.terminal-server.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
... if you want a fat client, use RHEL/Fedora & system-config-netboot which will prepare a NFS boot image to be shared by many fat clients... Ondrej PAGE Laurent wrote: > Thanks for your answers > > No, Firefox use 80-100% of CPU, but of course it's Flash, > my enterprise is a web agency, so we can't use adblock or other flash blocker > > There is no solution for run firefox and his plugins on local terminal? > > 2008/4/2, jam <[email protected]>: > >> On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 12:05 -0700, >> >> ltsp-developer-request-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > sorry for my English.. >> > thanks for this splendid system >> > >> >> >>> But, I have 6 ThinClients connected to my 2,5Ghz 2048Mo server Ubuntu >>> >>> with LTSP5, >>> >> > and when all ThinClients use FireFox, 2 CPU's server use 99% of >> > resources. >> > >> >> >>> I try to find how to implement Firefox as LocalApps but I didn't find >>> >> > anything... >> > >> > I see that you want to implement easy function in future LTSP 5.2(?) >> > so I want to know when you distribe this update? >> > >> > I want to downgrade to LTSP4.1, LocalApps is much easy to install, I >> > find resource with Google >> > >> > Can you help me? Downgrade or wait? or solution? >> >> >> Don't downgrade, 4's old and not supported. If it works fine else you >> are on your own. >> >> Just running 6 firefox's does not use 99% CPU, so what are they doing ? >> If they use 99% memory your system IS working properly. It is supposed >> to use all memory, not waste it by not using it. >> If you are using SWAP you don't have enough RAM (again tricky: Putting >> unused ram into SWAP is Good, swapping inuse RAM is Bad (for >> performance) >> >> Now the world gets tricky: For 1G RAM and over you should be running a >> 64 bit system. If you look technically how BIGRAM works you will see >> that despite everyone's opinions whichever way 64bit is the only option. >> This is especially true with ThinClients where simultainious apps are >> running as opposed to 'lots of serial apps' which is better suited to >> BIGRAM. >> So IMHO you do not give good reason for local apps. Hey it's your >> system, you do what you like, I'm just arguing how-hard vs the-benefit >> >> Also to run local apps you will need to have 512M+ in each client. >> >> LocalApps will happen, they are WIP. I tried because I wanted skype. In >> the end a fat-client was easier. >> >> James >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. >> It's the best place to buy or sell services for >> just about anything Open Source. >> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace >> _____________________________________________________________________ >> Ltsp-developer mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-developer >> For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-developer mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-developer For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net