Re: Re: Activity and bugs.

"Jason Bechtel" <[email protected]> Mon, 19 May 2003 11:48:39 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.linux.termserv.fsub.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Personally, I agree with Georg.  I wouldn't
maintain my own LTSP network with a bunch of
"empty" default-only sections.  It is a waste of
time and doesn't scale.

However, the format of the lts.conf file supports
this non-sensical use, so our module should
support it, too.  If someone gets a warm, fuzzy
feeling from seeing each of their workstations
represented individually in Webmin, then they
should be able to do it.  That person could also
just go into the BIND module of Webmin, though,
as they would probably have them all in DNS.

Jason


---- Begin Original Message ----
 From: Morten Werner Olsen <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, 19 May 2003 07:49:02 +0200
Subject: Re: [Termserv-devel] Re: Activity and bugs.

On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 09:28:52AM +0200, Georg
Baum wrote:
> >  - It is not possible to add a host only with
default values (even
> >    if the bug above is fixed).
> >
> >  - If I add a host only with default values
directly in
> >    /etc/ltsp/lts.conf, nothing is shown in
the webmin-ltsp-modules list
> >    of hosts.
> 
> The default values come from the defaults
section of lts.conf, so it does 
> not make sense to add a host with only the
default values. IMHO we have two 
> options:
> 1. Allow it, and don't care about the redundant
settings in lts.conf
> 2. Don't allow it and inform the user why.
> 
> I personally would prefer the second option.

I disagree with you and prefer the first option.
This because I think
it will be more clear to have all the hosts on
the webpage... but we
don't have to add values in the lts.conf-file,
just the host-entry,
e.g.:

  [ws001]
  [ws002]
  [ws003]

Or what do you think?
-- 

Mvh.
Morten Werner Olsen
---- End Original Message ----



/earth: file system full
Meet 30,000 Eco-Friendly Individuals: 
http://www.Care2.com/connect/