Re: Re: Activity and bugs.
"Jason Bechtel" <[email protected]> Mon, 19 May 2003 11:48:39 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.termserv.fsub.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Personally, I agree with Georg. I wouldn't maintain my own LTSP network with a bunch of "empty" default-only sections. It is a waste of time and doesn't scale. However, the format of the lts.conf file supports this non-sensical use, so our module should support it, too. If someone gets a warm, fuzzy feeling from seeing each of their workstations represented individually in Webmin, then they should be able to do it. That person could also just go into the BIND module of Webmin, though, as they would probably have them all in DNS. Jason ---- Begin Original Message ---- From: Morten Werner Olsen <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, 19 May 2003 07:49:02 +0200 Subject: Re: [Termserv-devel] Re: Activity and bugs. On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 09:28:52AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > > - It is not possible to add a host only with default values (even > > if the bug above is fixed). > > > > - If I add a host only with default values directly in > > /etc/ltsp/lts.conf, nothing is shown in the webmin-ltsp-modules list > > of hosts. > > The default values come from the defaults section of lts.conf, so it does > not make sense to add a host with only the default values. IMHO we have two > options: > 1. Allow it, and don't care about the redundant settings in lts.conf > 2. Don't allow it and inform the user why. > > I personally would prefer the second option. I disagree with you and prefer the first option. This because I think it will be more clear to have all the hosts on the webpage... but we don't have to add values in the lts.conf-file, just the host-entry, e.g.: [ws001] [ws002] [ws003] Or what do you think? -- Mvh. Morten Werner Olsen ---- End Original Message ---- /earth: file system full Meet 30,000 Eco-Friendly Individuals: http://www.Care2.com/connect/