Re: Smbmount et Tomsrtbt2.0.103...

Ah.  I see the problem.

The "mount -t smbfs" wrapper doesn't work, but "smbmount" directly does work.

When I do "mount -t smbfs //host /mountpoint -o options", it fails with the
'need mount version 6' message.  When I do 'smbmount //host /mountpoint -o
options', I get NLS codepage warnings, but it works.

Try with smbmount directly.

-Tom

On Fri, 10 May 2002, Stephane Boireau wrote:

> Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 11:38:05 +0200
> From: Stephane Boireau <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [tomsrtbt] Smbmount et Tomsrtbt2.0.103...
>
> Hi,
>
> I do the whole test again, trying to access a shared directory on a
> linux/samba PDC box and to another share on a winMe box without password for
> the second.
>
> I did the links as I told in my last mail.
>
> I wait a few minutes between two smbmount test.
> ...
> Nothing...
>
> I tried another thing:
> "smbmount -h" tells that we can do
> "mount -t smbfs -o username=myname,password=mypassword //pc16/public /mnt/smb4"
> But what I get is:
>         mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on //pc16/public,
>                or too many mounted file systems
>         SMBFS: need mount version 6
> Is there something with the "mount" version?
>
> After that, to be sure I'm not fool, I try again with Tomsrtbt1.7... and
> everything is all right.
>
> It doesn't solve the problem, but it's fine to success smbmounting shares...
>
> Thank you for the help you give, and the great job you do.
>
> Bye.
> *********************************************
>   Stéphane Boireau, personne ressource TICE
> [email protected] au collège Le Hameau,
> 1 rue Albert Schweitzer, BP 851, 27308 BERNAY
> *********************************************
>