Re: Errors in 2.0.103? (Re: 1.7.91?)

Either place will work, this is probably better for isolated bugs, the
wikiwiki is probably better for discussion of desired enhancements and
feature set changes and compromises.  -Tom

On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Guentcho Skordev wrote:

> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 18:12:27 +0100
> From: Guentcho Skordev <[email protected]>
> To: Tom Oehser <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [tomsrtbt] Errors in 2.0.103? (Re: 1.7.91?)
>
> Hello again,
>
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 06:02:29PM -0500, Tom Oehser wrote:
> > These are busybox problems, I am retesting now with a newer version of
> > busybox, that I think at least fixes the gzip problem. -Tom
>
> Some other programs show similar errors.
>
> I have also noticed that I often run into trouble if I don't add swap space
> at the beginning (I have 8 MB of RAM).
>
> Is the right place to report about problems or errors here in the list
> or in the Wikiwiki -> Bugs -> Possiblebugs (I think I have to register
> there before)?
>
> > On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Guentcho Skordev wrote:
> > > Subject: [tomsrtbt] Errors in 2.0.103? (Re: 1.7.91?)
> > > On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 06:08:37PM +0100, Guentcho Skordev wrote:
> > > > Some time ago (maybe not more than a month ago?) I have downloaded
> > > > tomsrtbt 1.7.91, I don't know from anymore which site (is there a
> > > > version history?). There were some problems:
>
> Actually, I have downloaded 2.0.103 twice. The first time I thought it
> was 1.7.91 because this the number that stays in the "tomsrtbt.lsm"
> file in the DOS zip archive is wrong.
>
> 	Title:          tomsrtbt
> 	Version:        1.7.91
> 	Entered-date:   10DEC98
> 	Description:    "The most Linux on one floppy."  (distribution
> 	or panic disk).
> 	[...]
>
> Regards
> Guentcho
>
> P.S. One really unimportant note: ddate has problems with 1st of March
> in leap years (problem in 2004, 2008 etc.) and also thinks 1900 and
> 2100 are leap.
>