Re: Spam filter

Vidar Tyldum Hansen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.trustix.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Morten Nilsen, 09.11.2006 16:45:
> Ariën Huisken wrote:
>> I just put in my main.cf:
> 
> With these rules, I get next to no spam..
> 
> smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes
> smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous
> smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = $smtpd_sasl_security_options
> smtpd_tls_auth_only = no
> smtpd_sasl_local_domain =
These have nothing to do with spam, though. It enables sasl, which is to 
authenticate your users when sending email.


> 
> smtpd_delay_reject = yes
> smtpd_helo_required = yes
> smtpd_helo_restrictions =
>   reject_non_fqdn_hostname,
This will cause a lot of false positives in my experience. DNS is widely 
broken out there as it's put in the hands of too many clueless admins.

There are more risky settings here I would not recommend for business 
usage. The main problem with this strict aproach is that you reject or 
accept based on a single parameter. I find this far too risky!

I would put more effort into amavisd and spamassassin where multiple 
checks are performed and no single rule will throwaway any mail. I 
removed all these extremist checks and all RBL checks from postfix and 
let spamassassin deal with them.

Of course, my subjective opinion.
_______________________________________________
tsl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.