Re: Swup hang

"Konstantin A. Lepikhov" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.trustix.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Oystein!

Wednesday 06, at 02:24:59 PM you wrote:

> * [Christian Haugan Toldnes] 
> 
> > If it's not picked up by the community soon, it will simply vanish, and 
> > later releases of TSL will either have the same old semi-broken swup, or 
> > migrate to some other solution, like apt perhaps.
> 
> apt-rpm for TSL wouldn't be so bad.  Would miss some features, but possibly
> gain others.  Repository levels would go away, but apt pinning could fix
> that (if that works in the rpm-backed version of apt).  I believe gpg
> integration in apt has improved a bit during the last 6-7 years, too :)
apt-rpm is very slow (not so slow as yum, but much slower than swup and
native apt-dpkg). Mostly is due how it's cache working - just a heap of
rpm headers nor db structure nor search optimization. If someone replace
this crap to some db-aware cache and cleanup the code it will be great
solution. But only for one-arch system because biarch is broken too ;)

-- 
WBR et al.

_______________________________________________
tsl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFdvbq3TEpd8GO1nMRAjkbAJ9WAW2+k3BzbQEz93yZGc3jp/3YYACglTqc
bV8vO40UASFWhptIppydcvg=
=i3ro
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.