Re: Discuss list
Christian Haugan Toldnes <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Aug 2007 15:47:08 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.trustix.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Private |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kyle Bresin wrote: > = > Still here. > = > I love my trustix 2.2 installs, and by the list of updates that keep = > popping up in swup, it is definitely being supported to suit my needs. Seems to me that's the only part Nived (the sole TSL developer) really = has time to do. And since 2.2 is the current stable version of TSL = (since November 8. 2004), he has no choice. The 3.1 release should have = been released 6 months after 3.0, which would have been January 2006. However, in Jan-06 I had my last month of employment with Comodo. Before = that Erlend found himself a new job, and so did Oystein. And with my = departure, all that was left was three fairly fresh Trustix developers: = Nived, Bipin, and Ajith, in India. As far as I can see, only Nived has = been working on TSL for the last year or so. Just to clarify: Erlend Midttun was THE original developer of TSL. Oystein Viggen joint the team at a very early stage, I'm guessing = somewhere at the time of TSL 1.1. I joined the team in October 2001, just after TSL 1.5 was released in = August. After that, a lot of community work was done to make 2.0 a reality. I'm = totally scared to mention names, as I don't want to forget anyone, and I = grateful and respectful of these guys. Anyway... you'll find their names = in the announcement: http://www.trustix.net/doc/history/2.0-announce.txt Take a look at the names, and try to find any of them on tsl-discuss the = last couple of years. You'll find Danny, but not saying anything that = can be interpreted as positive towards TSL. :) > But as others mentioned, I had a lot of problems getting trustix 3.0.x = > working. And, it's not apparent to me, from this list, that a lot has = > happened with trustix 3.0 in the last 2 years. Maybe that's an = > inaccurate impression, but it's the one I currently have. There has been updates to 3.0, as there should be. However, 3.0.5 has = taken a long time. Not to blame Nived. Being only 1 developer on a = distribution is very challenging. The main difference between 3.0 and 3.0.5 is the re-introduction of = Anaconda as the installer, instead of Viper, which was introduced in 3.0. The main reason for developing Viper was that the Comodo management = wanted Trustix to differentiate itself from other distributions, in a = more visible way. No real technical reasons, although we managed to come = up with a few, to keep the effort interesting for everyone involved. = People need to rationalize, you know.. ;) The only reason for reintroducing Anaconda in 3.0.5 was that everyone = that developed the closed-source Viper installer, was by then fired. The main problem with TSL is not that it's vulnerable to whatever the = Comodo management decides, although this is also true. The main problem = is that it's a distribution developed by one person, with an active = community of about 15 people, and an ever changing user mass. We, the original TSL developers, measured the download rate of 2.2 and = 3.0 before we left the sinking ship in late 2005/early 2006. The amazing = thing about the results was not the great amount of downloads each = month. The interesting part was WHO downloaded TSL. What we found was that of the ~3000 ISO downloads each month, about 90% = never downloaded swup updates. About 95% never downloaded the iso more = than once. Which mean that either: 1) Only a very small minority of the people that tested TSL actually = ended up using it. 2) The vast majority of downloaders had their IP address dynamically = changed via DHCP, hardly the choice of IT professionals. If you include the stats for the tsl-discuss mailing lists, = (http://christht.tihlde.org/tsl-discuss-stats-2.txt) you find that the = activity of the community has gone down from an average of ~400 postings = each month in late 2003 and early 2004, to an average of ~60 postings = from late 2006 to present day. That's a significant reduction. So the only real answer to Ari=EBns question is: No, almost nobody is still reading tsl-discuss, and yes, the vast = majority of the community has moved away to other distributions. Thank you for reading this, and both Ubuntu and CentOS are decent = alternatives to TSL. c