Re: Trying to run uClinux-2.4.27-uc1...
Johann Hanne <[email protected]> Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:10:45 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.uclinux.actiontec |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
As Patrick mentioned, this is probably the wrong list for this kind of problems. I also don't have used the modem for its purpose yet. However, I did use it as dial-IN service (with a modified firmware of course, but still with the original kernel and pppd), and it ran fine for several weeks without any problem. So I can still not promise, that I can help you to fix your device, but we can try to isolate the cause of the lock ups. First of all, as soon as you modem has locked up, please try to find out if it is still pingable (open the command prompt and enter 'ping 192.168.x.x', with the '192.168.x.x' replaced by the IP address of your DPCM). If it IS pingable, try to log into the shell (enter 'telnet 192.168.x.x', log in with username 'root' and password 'uClinux'). If it is not pingable, the kernel has locked up or the CPU has crashed - maybe a faulty device or a temperature problem. In theory, it could be a Linux kernel problem, but then mine would lock up, too. Make sure that your DPCM doesn't get too hot. Don't put anything on top of the modem case. If it is pingable, but you can't login with telnet, the device might be out of memory. Maybe due to some memory leak. You could also try to open your device and tell us which flash chip has been put into your modem. Mine has a intel flash, and I think somebody on the list mentioned that his one has an SST flash. The kernel support for SST flash has been added by actiontec, whereas most other modifications to the kernel has been done by Conexant. Maybe actiontec isn't that good at kernel level programming (and judging from what they did to mtdram.c, they are evil ;-)). Cheers, Johann On Wednesday 05 January 2005 00:09, dfg wrote: > Patrick m, > I have tried to contact Actiontec but they arent any help. Wondering if > you could help. My modem constantly locks up when in use and idle. I > have to reset it to get it to work again. Any ideas? > KLM > > -----Original Message----- > From: actionhack-bounces-W7/[email protected] > [mailto:actionhack-bounces-W7/[email protected]] On Behalf Of Patrick McNamara > Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 2:12 PM > To: ActionHack Collaboration > Subject: Re: [actionhack] Trying to run uClinux-2.4.27-uc1... > > > Nobody here but us chickens... > > It may be a couple of days, but when I get a chance I'll dust off my > board and see what I can tell you. > > Patrick M > > --- Johann Hanne <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi everybody (if there's still somebody), > > > > i'm currently trying to get uClinux-2.4.27-uc1 running on my DPCM. > > Most of the cx82100 is already in the stock distribution. > > Additionally, I've put in most armnommu stuff which differed between > > uClinux-2.4.6.0pre1 and the kernel released by Actiontec (including > > Bruce's files) and also the emac driver. It does compile so far, but > > it does not run. The big problem is that I do not own a devlopment > > board, so I can't look at the serial port for any boot messages. > > > > So please, can anybody grab my kernel at > > http://www.bettina-attack.de/jonny/linuz > > and look if it does at least outputs some lines. If so, I would have > > something > > to start with and I'd try to order the parts for the dev board. I'm > > living in > > > Germany and it would be quite expensive due to shipping and import tax > > > > for > > all the parts. Maybe somebody can help me with that, I'd also like to > > have a > > > second DPCM and it would be much cheaper to get it shipped in one > > package > > > (also with the 110V power supply removed, it's useles here). > > > > As already noted, the kernel does NOT boot the board completely. > > However, it > > did not kill the board, i.e. I was able to recover the board with the > > original kernel with the usual hold-button/tftp procedure. But this > > does not > > > mean that it doesn't kill YOUR board, so before you try it out, make > > sure you > > > have the USB recovery stuff working. You have been warned. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Johann > > __ > > actionhack Mailing List - actionhack-W7/[email protected] > > http://www.express.org/mailman/listinfo/actionhack > > http://www.embeddedlinuxinterfacing.com/wiki.php/ActiontecDualModem > > __ > actionhack Mailing List - actionhack-W7/[email protected] > http://www.express.org/mailman/listinfo/actionhack > http://www.embeddedlinuxinterfacing.com/wiki.php/ActiontecDualModem > > __ > actionhack Mailing List - actionhack-W7/[email protected] > http://www.express.org/mailman/listinfo/actionhack > http://www.embeddedlinuxinterfacing.com/wiki.php/ActiontecDualModem __ actionhack Mailing List - actionhack-W7/[email protected] http://www.express.org/mailman/listinfo/actionhack http://www.embeddedlinuxinterfacing.com/wiki.php/ActiontecDualModem