Re: migration issue scheduling while atomic
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.uclinux.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMuHMdXK4P6DtqM-+r3YJgGgJz5M0LAPgrqUdFB60=5a+L2NDQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Luis Alves <[email protected]> wrote: > Anyway... Digging in the kernel sources and reading some stuff, I > concluded that "Sleep inside atomic section checking" doesn't make > sense since the m68k arch doesn't support SMP or preemption. > From what I could understand this check looks for scheduling inside > spinlocks (that should disable preemption). > In my case, since I don't have preemption enabled in the first place, > then spinlocks do absolutely nothing (the ones that don't disable > irqs). Isn't this message also printed while scheduling with interrupts disabled? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected] In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by [email protected] To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev