Re: Having troubles in updating MTD partitions
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.uclinux.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMuHMdUqfqxfxHxuMY1W1jfovun3WvXy05wsYUHz53Pwrio+jw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Suki Buryani <[email protected]> wrote: >>5824 is the usable size of the file system on mtdblock3, i.e. after subtracting > the overhead for file system bookkeeping. > > By default mtd partitions were like > > cat /proc/partitions > major minor #blocks name > > 31 0 8192 mtdblock0 > 31 1 256 mtdblock1 > 31 2 2048 mtdblock2 > 31 3 5824 mtdblock3 > 31 4 64 mtdblock4 > > mtdblock3 was having 5824 blocks and 5824 blocks were able to use, > > I think you are missing my point, i have increase size of mtdblock3 but i am unable use whole partion and idk why Sorry, I indeed misunderstood you. Could it be that jffs2 requires a minimum granularity for file system sizes? Probably the size needs to be a multiple of the eraseblock size? $ factor 5824 5824: 2 2 2 2 2 2 7 13 $ factor 5884 5884: 2 2 1471 I.e. the former is a multiple of 64 (KiB), the latter is a multiple of 4 (KiB). > there is one more thing, Can any one tell me how i can change eraseblock for a partition, i > believe i also having wrong eraseblock for mtdblock3 Sorry, I don't know. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected] In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds