Re: [PATCH 32/53] ext4: move dcache modifying code out of __ext4_link()

On Fri 13-03-26 08:12:19, NeilBrown wrote:
...
> diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
> index a1219b446b74..c48337d95f9a 100644
> --- a/fs/dcache.c
> +++ b/fs/dcache.c
> @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static inline int dname_external(const struct dentry *dentry)
>  	return dentry->d_name.name != dentry->d_shortname.string;
>  }
>  
> -void take_dentry_name_snapshot(struct name_snapshot *name, struct dentry *dentry)
> +void take_dentry_name_snapshot(struct name_snapshot *name, const struct dentry *dentry)
>  {
>  	unsigned seq;
>  	const unsigned char *s;

The constification of take_dentry_name_snapshot() should probably be a
separate patch? Also I'd note that this constification (and the
constification of __ext4_fc_track_link()) isn't really needed here because
ext4_fc_track_link() will immediately bail through ext4_fc_disabled() when
fast commit replay is happening so __ext4_fc_track_link() never gets called
in that case - more about that below.

> @@ -1471,7 +1471,15 @@ static int ext4_fc_replay_link_internal(struct super_block *sb,
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +	ihold(inode);
> +	inc_nlink(inode);
>  	ret = __ext4_link(dir, inode, dentry_inode);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		drop_nlink(inode);
> +		iput(inode);
> +	} else {
> +		d_instantiate(dentry_inode, inode);
> +	}
>  	/*
>  	 * It's possible that link already existed since data blocks
>  	 * for the dir in question got persisted before we crashed OR
...
> @@ -3460,8 +3460,6 @@ int __ext4_link(struct inode *dir, struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry)
>  		ext4_handle_sync(handle);
>  
>  	inode_set_ctime_current(inode);
> -	ext4_inc_count(inode);
> -	ihold(inode);
>  
>  	err = ext4_add_entry(handle, dentry, inode);
>  	if (!err) {
> @@ -3471,11 +3469,7 @@ int __ext4_link(struct inode *dir, struct inode *inode, struct dentry *dentry)
>  		 */
>  		if (inode->i_nlink == 1)
>  			ext4_orphan_del(handle, inode);
> -		d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
> -		ext4_fc_track_link(handle, dentry);
> -	} else {
> -		drop_nlink(inode);
> -		iput(inode);
> +		__ext4_fc_track_link(handle, inode, dentry);

This looks wrong. If fastcommit replay is running, we must skip calling
__ext4_fc_track_link(). Similarly if the filesystem is currently
inelligible for fastcommit (due to some complex unsupported operations
running in parallel). Why did you change ext4_fc_track_link() to
__ext4_fc_track_link()?

> @@ -3504,7 +3498,16 @@ static int ext4_link(struct dentry *old_dentry,
>  	err = dquot_initialize(dir);
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
> -	return __ext4_link(dir, inode, dentry);
> +	ihold(inode);
> +	ext4_inc_count(inode);

I'd put inc_nlink() here instead. We are guaranteed to have a regular file
anyway and it matches what we do in ext4_fc_replay_link_internal().
Alternatively we could consistently use ext4_inc_count() &
ext4_dec_count() in these functions.

> +	err = __ext4_link(dir, inode, dentry);
> +	if (err) {
> +		drop_nlink(inode);
> +		iput(inode);
> +	} else {
> +		d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
> +	}
> +	return err;
>  }

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR