Re: [PATCH 6.18 000/212] 6.18.20-rc1 review
Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.uml.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 14:43:41 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.18.20 release. > There are 212 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Mar 2026 13:44:33 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Boot-tested under QEMU for Rust x86_64, arm64 and riscv64; built-tested for loongarch64: Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]> For UML, I am seeing: In file included from kernel/fork.c:108: In file included from ./include/linux/unwind_deferred.h:6: In file included from ./include/linux/unwind_user.h:6: ./arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h:23:12: error: no member named 'flags' in 'struct pt_regs' 23 | if (regs->flags & X86_VM_MASK) | ~~~~ ^ ./arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h:23:20: error: use of undeclared identifier 'X86_VM_MASK' 23 | if (regs->flags & X86_VM_MASK) | ^ ./arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h:26:7: error: call to undeclared function 'user_64bit_mode'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 26 | if (!user_64bit_mode(regs)) | ^ We probably need at least: aa7387e79a5c ("unwind_user/x86: Fix arch=um build") Or perhaps the split of the guards added later. Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]> Cc: Anton Ivanov <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Berg <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] I hope that helps! Cheers, Miguel