Re: [PATCH 6.18 000/212] 6.18.20-rc1 review

Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.uml.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.stable
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 14:43:41 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.18.20 release.
> There are 212 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Mar 2026 13:44:33 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Boot-tested under QEMU for Rust x86_64, arm64 and riscv64; built-tested
for loongarch64:

Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

For UML, I am seeing:

    In file included from kernel/fork.c:108:
    In file included from ./include/linux/unwind_deferred.h:6:
    In file included from ./include/linux/unwind_user.h:6:
    ./arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h:23:12: error: no member named 'flags' in 'struct pt_regs'
       23 |         if (regs->flags & X86_VM_MASK)
          |             ~~~~  ^
    ./arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h:23:20: error: use of undeclared identifier 'X86_VM_MASK'
       23 |         if (regs->flags & X86_VM_MASK)
          |                           ^
    ./arch/x86/include/asm/unwind_user.h:26:7: error: call to undeclared function 'user_64bit_mode'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
       26 |         if (!user_64bit_mode(regs))
          |              ^

We probably need at least:

  aa7387e79a5c ("unwind_user/x86: Fix arch=um build")

Or perhaps the split of the guards added later.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Cc: Richard Weinberger <[email protected]>
Cc: Anton Ivanov <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]

I hope that helps!

Cheers,
Miguel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.