Re: Linux ease of use

Mario Michael da Costa <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:46:47 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.usability.annoyances
Organization ControlNet (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Message-ID <20031029194647.GA24003@mario>
+++ Eric G Ortego [29/10/03 08:07 -0600]:
> 
> 
> Mario Michael da Costa wrote:
> 
> >+++ Eric G Ortego [28/10/03 08:05 -0600]:
> > 
> >
> >>-rwxr-xr-x    1 redog    users      506312 Jun 28  2002 mutt
> >>lrwxrwxrwx    1 redog    users          13 Nov  7  2002 pine -> 
> >>/usr/bin/mutt
> >>   
> >>
> >
> >now that is cute :o)
> >
> >just curious though why not have pine point to mutt that is in ~/bin?
> >
> ah actualy that caused me some woes, I use the emerged copy of mutt on 
> this computer. ~/bin/ was an rsync from my home computer an x86, this 
> box is a ppc.
> 

Eric,
indeed your headers indicate that you are on a ppc:

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030924

so the mutt in ~/bin is compiled for the ppc i suppose. just out of curiosity
since i have never come close to a ppc, how difficult was the compile? i'm no
geek, but sometime back i did run into some problems trying to compile mutt
on my pIII using the --prefix=$HOME option. apart from that mutt compiled
just fine.

at present i am using knoppix-hdinstall and am still getting used to the
"apt-get" way of doing things. apart from a few kinks because of the debian
stable/unstable issues, apt-get is very very sweet for a newbie like me.
however i can now compile mutt with the --prefix=$HOME option. 

mario
-- 
Mario Michael da Costa <[email protected]>
-----------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed in this mail are mine
and may not reflect those of my employer.