Re: Linux ease of use
Mario Michael da Costa <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:46:47 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Organization | ControlNet (India) Pvt. Ltd. |
| Message-ID | <20031029194647.GA24003@mario> |
+++ Eric G Ortego [29/10/03 08:07 -0600]: > > > Mario Michael da Costa wrote: > > >+++ Eric G Ortego [28/10/03 08:05 -0600]: > > > > > >>-rwxr-xr-x 1 redog users 506312 Jun 28 2002 mutt > >>lrwxrwxrwx 1 redog users 13 Nov 7 2002 pine -> > >>/usr/bin/mutt > >> > >> > > > >now that is cute :o) > > > >just curious though why not have pine point to mutt that is in ~/bin? > > > ah actualy that caused me some woes, I use the emerged copy of mutt on > this computer. ~/bin/ was an rsync from my home computer an x86, this > box is a ppc. > Eric, indeed your headers indicate that you are on a ppc: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030924 so the mutt in ~/bin is compiled for the ppc i suppose. just out of curiosity since i have never come close to a ppc, how difficult was the compile? i'm no geek, but sometime back i did run into some problems trying to compile mutt on my pIII using the --prefix=$HOME option. apart from that mutt compiled just fine. at present i am using knoppix-hdinstall and am still getting used to the "apt-get" way of doing things. apart from a few kinks because of the debian stable/unstable issues, apt-get is very very sweet for a newbie like me. however i can now compile mutt with the --prefix=$HOME option. mario -- Mario Michael da Costa <[email protected]> ----------------------------------------------- The opinions expressed in this mail are mine and may not reflect those of my employer.