Re: Re: outlook (was IE only sites)
"Daniel C. von Asmuth" <asmuth-8LkvcxCLB6JmR6Xm/[email protected]> Wed, 26 Nov 2003 12:55:44 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thus quoth Richard Corfield on Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:45:31AM +0100: > > Outlook is an example of getting to like what you're used to. I don't use its > PIM functions (I use OpenWebmail for that, reachable anywhere) and find its > threading implementation terrible. Then again, I've always been used to a > threaded mailer. I switch between Mutt, Mozilla and OpenWebMail depending on > where I am and what I'm doing. Tried KMail, but got into the Mozilla habit for > HTML mail instead. You stick with what you're used to. This has nothing to do with Linux at all.... but if there's one thing I really hate it's Outlook. For one an e-mail client should read and write e-mail, not play calendar or something. Second when you reply to a message it quotes the original message the wrong way. Third, I have not seen a decent GUI-driven e-mail program (remember to break your lines somewhere around the 75'th column). Fourth, e-mail should not contain HTML. Fifth, if windows users use Mozilla instead of Outleak and Exploder they will get half the number of viruses, worms, and trojans. Kind regards, Daniel von Asmuth -- MONOPOLIE een vergissing van Windows in uw nadeel alle programma's zijn gestopt en niet opgeslagen gegevens verloren gooi Mijn Computer direkt in de Prullenbak ga niet langs Start; u ontvangt geen Eur 20.000