RE: Re: outlook (was IE only sites)

I might agree with you, but I've tried MANY email clients (or MUAs, like
people call them now) and PIMs, and ENDED using Outlook (btw, its last
incarnation has a better multithreaded behaviour). I still dislike a few
things about Outlook (like handling outgoing filters) but in general I like
it better than any other. (I don't hate M$ for all the software they make,
there are enough other reasons to hate them.)

I don't even consider non-graphical software. It's just an opinion.

p

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: annoyances-bounces-DzJonyRHso41Ayx8vbq1stBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org [mailto:annoyances-bounces@dee-
> annleblanc.com] En nombre de Richard Corfield
> Enviado el: miércoles, 26 de noviembre de 2003 9:46
> Para: [email protected]
> Asunto: [Annoyances] Re: outlook (was IE only sites)
> 
> 
> Outlook is an example of getting to like what you're used to. I don't use
> its
> PIM functions (I use OpenWebmail for that, reachable anywhere) and find
> its
> threading implementation terrible. Then again, I've always been used to a
> threaded mailer. I switch between Mutt, Mozilla and OpenWebMail depending
> on
> where I am and what I'm doing. Tried KMail, but got into the Mozilla habit
> for
> HTML mail instead. You stick with what you're used to.
> 
>  - Richard
> 
> --
>    _/_/_/  _/_/_/  _/_/_/ Richard dot Corfield    at    ntlworld dot com
>   _/  _/    _/    _/
>  _/_/      _/    _/               Time is a one way street,
> _/  _/  _/_/    _/_/_/                 Except in the Twighlight Zone.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> annoyances mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://michelangelo.renaissoft.com/mailman/listinfo/annoyances
>