Linux on the desktop
"Daniel C. von Asmuth" <asmuth-8LkvcxCLB6JmR6Xm/[email protected]> Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:32:02 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Why is Linux so slow to conquer the desktop? The major obstacle seems to be the lack of applications. Why are there so few applications for Linux? Well, that's no true. If you search freshmeat and sourceforge you will find an ever growing number of software projects. The question should read "why are there so few commercial applications?". The size of the market is smaller than for the Competition, but this is not the whole answer. When you consider the failure of Linux desktop software like WordPerfect, ApplixWare and Kylix, an important reason would be the Gift Culture of the Linux crowd. They will go for anything that comes free of charge if they can. There is no Photoshop for Linux, because Gimp is good enough. There is an Oracle, but MySql is good enough for most users. TextMaker is a nice word processor, but the majority favours OpenOffice. (giving Sun a hard time to sell StarOffice). A viable commercial Linux application will need some unique feature. There are examples, like Mathematica, SPSS, and BitKeeper, but these are outside Joe Sixpack's budget. Happy Holidays, Daniel -- MONOPOLIE een vergissing van Windows in uw nadeel alle programma's zijn gestopt en niet opgeslagen gegevens verloren gooi Mijn Computer direkt in de Prullenbak ga niet langs Start; u ontvangt geen Eur 20.000