Re: auditing problems
Alex Butcher <[email protected]> Sun, 13 Mar 2005 00:34:01 +0000 (GMT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 [email protected] wrote: > I'm not sure why the horrible auditing problems are less horrible > when one is doing all the dependency work manually rather than > automatically -- I would have assumed the reverse. I'm not about > to rebuild my whole system every time a new security patch gets > issued -- something new would break in the build every time. I'm not sure whether your comments are in response to my post, but if they are... The point I was making that if packages started including all their dependencies in the package, you'd need to check every package on your system, see whether it links against the affected version(s) of the dependency and rebuild it. As things are, and assuming dynamic linking, then all you need to do is update the dependency in question and restart any processes using it that are currently running. Best Regards, Alex. -- Alex Butcher Brainbench MVP for Internet Security: www.brainbench.com Bristol, UK Need reliable and secure network systems? PGP/GnuPG ID:0x271fd950 <http://www.assursys.com/>