Re: Linux ease of use
"Daniel C. von Asmuth" <asmuth-8LkvcxCLB6JmR6Xm/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thus quoth Peter Flynn on Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:42:50PM +0100: > On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 00:17, Alex Netherton wrote: > > > My question; why can't the developers of Linux (and I know there are > > millions of them) develop some way that you can download a file, or > > find a file on CD, click it and it installs itself? Linux does not have a command named 'click'; maybe you mean 'clock'? > Because the designers and developers don't believe that it should be > simple. With Linux, you are expected to know what files go where, > and how to install from a .tar.gz file. They believe if you can't > type tar zxf foo.tar.gz; cd foo; ./configure; make; make install > then you shouldn't be using Linux at all :-) Often, Linux gets as simple as just that... But Linux is very flexible and easy to tweak, so installation needs a bit of manual work. > Some vendors have tried to make it easier (RPM, apt-get, etc) but > because everyone has their own ideas about where things should go, > there is not (and never will be) any standard place, and hence no The Linux File System Hierarchy standard tells you what goes where. > standard method. I'm afraid that's the penalty we pay for an Open > Source system: everyone is free to do as they wish. > Kind regards, Daniel von Asmuth -- wat heb je nodig bij een uitzichtloos leven? euthanasie? nee, windows. van microsoft? nee, van glas.