Re: Wildly different keystroke bindings
Eric G Ortego <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
kwan-H/XkN3sKs40TjC5v63tWQwC/[email protected] wrote: >From: David Vehrs <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [Annoyances] Wildly different keystroke bindings > > > >>OK so you want the same keystrokes to do the same thing in different >>applications. >> >> I do. I would like to see vi keys as a setting in almost everything, Mozilla's Browser and Mail client , BitchX, heck I could prolly use a vi mouse. Ayone ever see viGore ? Now thats an annoyance! >Very good point, but not the thrust of my annoyance. In all honesty, I did >think of this objection to using the same bindings. Which one would take >precendence? The problem is when it comes to redefing the key sequence, or >even being able to escape the screen or vi bindings so that the >application (vi), shell (screen and bash), terminal (xterm, konsole), >window manager (fluxbox, ice, gnome, kde) and X know what to do with each >sequence. > > > >_______________________________________________ >annoyances mailing list >[email protected] >http://michelangelo.renaissoft.com/mailman/listinfo/annoyances > > > >