RE: GNU gcc upgrades
"Jacq, John" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <E37243C4DE48D4118AB400508BADE4630C3D7741@itmel-msg04.itmel.bhp.com.au> |
-----Original Message----- From: Daniel C. von Asmuth [mailto:asmuth-8LkvcxCLB6JmR6Xm/[email protected]] > >If you're the author, be thankful for any warning you get (much better than >the Microsoft C compiler for Unix which gives you few warnings), if you're >not the author, you just type 'make' and ignore all those warnings. Hard to ignore if the code doesn't compile at all because of "errors" :^) And yes I am the author more often than not, I still wonder why upgrading your gcc compiler causes code deemed 100% valid with the previous gcc version to be suddenly deemed badly lame. Seems kind of strange to me. John EOM NOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.