Re: Red Hat vs Debian, installing a POP server. Security
Shamim Mohamed <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
For running servers, especially in a business environment where one wants predictability, Debian is a huge win over RedHat. (However I admit that I get annoyed at Linux too often in this setting; I use OpenBSD or FreeBSD. My biggest beef is that config files are all over the place. With the BSDs you know everything's in /etc. I don't like modules either, too much variability. I'm not afraid of recompiling anything, and in a server setting I do, so I can ensure it's a minimal set of features.) In desktop usage, I think RedHat does fine. Good integration with xft so anti-aliased fonts are used by most applications. (I use quite a few old X11 apps that don't use xft.) So what if it installs and runs things like gpm that I never use? Doesn't hurt anything. It also does a good job of automatically detecting all kinds of hardware. I'm surprised at the one message where he stayed logged in as root the whole time. That's just asking for trouble! I know that on RedHat systems, if you run something that needs super-user rights, it puts up a dialog asking for the root password. -s