Re: Free Software vs. Librous Software
Isaac Hummel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.usability.annoyances |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Adam Ophir Shapira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to coin a term, that term being "librous software". It means
> the same thing as "free software" ("free" as in speech). The
> advantage of using the term "librous software" instead of "free
> software" is that now you won't have to explain over and over untill
> you're blue in the face the difference between "free as in speech"
> and "free as in beer".
<snip>
> It's about time we have a term that means the same thing, but which
> is free (no-pun-intended) of this ambiguity.
We do have such a term already: Open Source. It is free of the ambiguity
that you stated and I believe that it was coined for the same reason
that you wanted to coin "librous" (incidentally, it should be liberous,
not librous; librous would mean bookish or booklike).
-Isaac Hummel